Photo: (a) Palmar (left) and dorsal (right) views of the right hand bones, (b) found in situ in semi-articulation with the palm up and fingers flexed. The palmar surface of the metacarpals (Mc) and dorsal surface of the intermediate phalanges (IP) can be seen. DP, distal phalanx; PP, proximal phalanx. Author: Tracy L. Kivell, Andrew S. Deane, Matthew W. Tocheri, Caley M. Orr, Peter Schmid, John Hawks, Lee R. Berger & Steven E. Churchill. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Last week, scientists announced that Homo naledi, the mysterious new humanlike species is believed to have lived in southern Africa at the same time as the earliest years of Homo sapiens, bringing into question previous findings about fossil record.
Also: See “Evolution” as You’ve Never Seen It Before
Researchers first unveiled more than 1,500 fossils from 15 individuals, both male and female, your and old, in 2015, two years after they were discovered in the Rising Cave Star system in South Africa’s Gauteng province. The site, located just 50 km from Johannesburg, is part of the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32857/32857fae211c811fb806a7b01ddf80e661c5d6b2" alt=""
The Homo naledi facial reconstruction, performed with the coherent anatomical deformation technique. Author: Cicero Moraes (Arc-Team) et alii. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
In papers published on May 9, 2017 in eLife, paleoanthropologist Lee Berger provided evidence that the bones of H. naledi are as recent as 236,000 years, putting it in the early Middle Stone Age, at the same time and place as H. sapiens in its youngest years.
From the fossil evidence, researchers have deduced that H. naledi maintained a curious mixture of ape and human traits such as a tiny brain and long legs, along with capabilities to walk long distance and make tools. The time frame suggests that the stone-tool record in South Africa from this period is no longer exclusively the provenance of H. sapiens, and that what has been discovered thus far could potentially be attributed to H. naledi.
What’s more, Berger’s team made a second announcement last week: the discovered of a second chamber containing additional H. naledi fossils. Located 300 feet from the first chamber, this second cave included about 130 additional fossils representing two adults and one child.
One of the adult skeletons, a male they have named Neo, is nearly complete, and the skull has many of its face bones well preserved. Scientists are considered Neo comparable in preservation to the Lucy skeleton—the famous 3.2-million-year-old skeleton of Austrolopithecus afarensis from Ethiopia.
The discovery of a second cave adds evidence to the theory that H. naledi maintained a practice of burying their dead—something believed to be an exclusively human trait.
Berger told The Washington Post, “This is a humbling discovery for science. It’s reminding us that the fossil record can hide things…we can never assume that what we have tells the whole story.”
Miss Rosen is a journalist covering art, photography, culture, and books. Her byline has appeared in L’Uomo Vogue, Vogue Online, Whitewall, The Undefeated, Dazed Digital, Jocks and Nerds, and L’Oeil de la Photographie. Follow her on Twitter @Miss_Rosen.
Homo Naledi
-
Scientists Announce New Details About the Mysterious Homo Naledi
Reconstucted Homo naledi skull made from casts taken from two different specimens as no complete skulls of this species have been found. Homo naledi is an extinct hominin, first identified in 2013, that lived in Sterkfontein area of South Africa. The cranial capacity of the skull is between 465 and 560 cm3, roughly one third that of modern humans.[1][2][3] During September and October 2015, this reconstruction was part of the Naledi Fossil Exhibition on public display at the Maropeng Visitor Centre, Cradle of Humankind site (close to where it was found). The whole collection is now in the safgekeeping of the University of the Witwatersrand. Author: Martinvl. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
-
Scientists Announce New Details About the Mysterious Homo Naledi
Replica crania of (left to right) Homo habilis (KNM-ER 1813, Koobi Fora, Kenya ∼1.8 million years old), an early Homo erectus (D2700, Dmanisi, Georgia ∼1.8 million years old) and Homo floresiensis (Liang Bua 1, Indonesia ∼20,000 years old) are compared with actual fragments of cranial material of Homo naledi that have been overlaid on a virtual reconstruction (far right; note some of the images of H. naledi material have been reversed). Author: Chris Stringer, Natural History Museum, United Kingdom. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
-
Scientists Announce New Details About the Mysterious Homo Naledi
LES1 cranium from Homo naledi. Clockwise from upper left: three-quarter, frontal, superior and left lateral views. Fragments of the right temporal, the parietal and the occipital have also been recovered (not pictured), but without conjoins to the reconstructed vault or face. Scale bar = 5 cm. Author: John Hawks, Marina Elliott, Peter Schmid et al. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
-
Scientists Announce New Details About the Mysterious Homo Naledi
The Homo naledi facial reconstruction, performed with the coherent anatomical deformation technique. Author: Cicero Moraes (Arc-Team) et alii. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
-
Scientists Announce New Details About the Mysterious Homo Naledi
(a) Palmar (left) and dorsal (right) views of the right hand bones, (b) found in situ in semi-articulation with the palm up and fingers flexed. The palmar surface of the metacarpals (Mc) and dorsal surface of the intermediate phalanges (IP) can be seen. DP, distal phalanx; PP, proximal phalanx. Author: Tracy L. Kivell, Andrew S. Deane, Matthew W. Tocheri, Caley M. Orr, Peter Schmid, John Hawks, Lee R. Berger & Steven E. Churchill. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
-
Scientists Announce New Details About the Mysterious Homo Naledi
All elements belong to Foot 1. (a) Dorsal view. (b) Distal view of the cuneiforms and cuboid showing transverse arch reconstruction. (c) Medial view showing the moderate longitudinal arch. Scale is in cm. Author?: W. E. H. Harcourt-Smith, Z. Throckmorton, K. A. Congdon, B. Zipfel, A. S. Deane, M. S. M. Drapeau, S. E. Churchill, L. R. Berger & J. M. DeSilva. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.